- Famous Church Fathers
- Virgin Birth: A Forgery
- Virgin Birth: A Forgery Part 2
- The Davidic Lineage through Solomon
- Why the Jews Reject Jesus as Messiah
- Everlasting Life or Salvation?
- Who Changed the Name of the Messiah?
- Why they murdered Jesus
- Does Jesus Really Save?
- The Bible Corrupted Part 1
- The Bible Corrupted Part 2
- The Bible Corrupted Part 3
- Story of Jesus’ Birth Corrupted
- Jesus Prophecies 1
- Jesus Prophecies 2
- Trinity: Doctrine of Delusion
Sir William Whiston in his Second letter to the Bishop of London, 1719, p. 15
“We certainly know of a greater number of interpolations and corruptions brought into the Scriptures by the Athanasians, and relating to the Doctrine of the Trinity, than in any other case whatsoever. While we have not, that I know of, any such interpolation or corruption made in any one of them by either the Eusebians or Arians.”
“I truly believe what Jesus and his disciples taught, I just have no way of knowing exactly what they actually did say.” — Doug Brown
But there shall arise after you, men of perverse minds who shall through ignorance or through craft, suppress many things which I have spoken unto you, and lay to me things which I never taught, sowing tares among the good wheat which I have given you to sow in the world. (Gospel Of The Nazirenes 44:7)
Dean John W. Burgon, one of the most respected of scholars, is cited by Dr. David O. Fuller in his book WHICH BIBLE?, when he wrote in reference to Codexes B, Aleph, D, and L: “I insist and am prepared to prove that the text of these two Codexes (B and Aleph) is very nearly the foulest in existence” (Pp. 126-127); and “That they exhibit fabricated texts is demonstratable… B and Aleph are covered all over with blots — Aleph even more than B…. We suspect that these two manuscripts are indebted for their preservation, SOLELY TO THEIR ASCERTAINED EVIL CHARACTER” (Pg. 93, 128). Burgon then goes on further and states: “No amount of honest copying — persevered in for any number of centuries — could possibility have resulted in two such documents” (Pg. 93). Burgon also said: “By far the most depraved text is that exhibited by CODEX D” (Pg. 93).
Terrific post, I have bookmarked this internet site so with any luck, I’ll see much more on this subject matter in the foreseeable future!
Have you investigated other books deemed “holy” from other religions to see if those writings are more acccurate? If so, what did you find? If not, why not?
There is truth in all religions. But there is no way to prove any “holy book”, not even the bible.
In fact, it is even less possible with the bible since there are no original manuscripts to compare with the ones that are being used. What’s more is that scholars tell us that the worse possible translations of copies were used to create the most popular King James Version of the bible — it’s not a wonder that there are so many version and revisions of the bible.
The reason we don’t have the original manuscripts is that unscrupulous men burned or hid them for the obvious motive that no one would be able to discover the modifications, forgeries and things they left out to create the books that comprise the New Testament we have today.
“What’s more is that scholars tell us that the worse possible translations of copies were used to create the most popular King James Version of the bible — it’s not a wonder that there are so many version and revisions of the bible.” Yups your right that they had lot of revisions on the bible and in somehow this might affect a little and could question on the content of the revision on it. Thanks!